What about indexing the jpeg tags such as location, camera and title/subject if they are included? There is also often copyright info embedded in the file. You can see this if you open one in a hex editor. All of this should be readable and indexable.
I made a search query and got a result with the blurb matching only the text in an image. Just to be sure i went to google's cache of it and it still only matched the image.
Too bad most of the time the image is an advertisement.
There's also text within the images themselves such as their headers. Similar to the way camera images contain EXIF information? Will that get spidered too?
Any update on the subject?
It's been almost 4 years.
Common man ! Please unleash the power of all the "demotavional posters", all around the web, waiting for fame.
What about indexing the jpeg tags such as location, camera and title/subject if they are included? There is also often copyright info embedded in the file. You can see this if you open one in a hex editor. All of this should be readable and indexable.
perhaps this image is showing because it has links going to it from other sites, and these are text links.
They are already doing it.
I made a search query and got a result with the blurb matching only the text in an image. Just to be sure i went to google's cache of it and it still only matched the image.
Too bad most of the time the image is an advertisement.
Taking photos of nearly every street in America is a lot of work, too. But Google does it with street view.
There's also text within the images themselves such as their headers. Similar to the way camera images contain EXIF information? Will that get spidered too?
It's cool how you know more about Google than the guys who work there.
No, they can only read the alt attribute from images.
The pool table is the perfect surrounding for this kind of creative energies, isn't it? 🙂
Is there other Google department using youtube to answer people's question? Like GMail?