Will Webmaster Tools give examples of which links or pages caused a manual spam action?



Will Webmaster Tools ever tell us what links caused a penalty?
Ben Holland, Phoenix, AZ

Have a question? Ask it in our Webmaster Help Forum: http://groups.google.com/a/googleproductforums.com/forum/#!forum/webmasters

Want your question to be answered on a video like this? Follow us on Twitter and look for an announcement when we take new questions: http://twitter.com/googlewmc

More videos: http://www.youtube.com/GoogleWebmasterHelp
Webmaster Central Blog: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/
Webmaster Central: http://www.google.com/webmasters/

source

24 thoughts on “Will Webmaster Tools give examples of which links or pages caused a manual spam action?”

  1. I agree. We have done everything we can, including spending countless hours looking through links and disavowing bad links. We run a reputable business and pay Google thousands of dollars per months for Adwords. We have been denied yet again on our latest reconsideration request. Very frustrating.

  2. A strategy which you can be followed to resolve this issue:
    1) Track your keyword ranking daily.
    2) Track your backlinks daily.
    3) If you see sudden fluctuation in ranking due to back link then remove those link by contacting webmaster of that site.

  3. It is silly penalizing sites for links in. In fact, it is silly assigning any kind of credibility to a site for links in. A better gauge of a web pages "value" is what links are going OUT from it. Links in are too easily manipulated to be relevant tools for ranking. The logarithm is severely flawed in this regard and is evident by so many outdated results and first pages of SERPs showing two or three sites only for all top 10 results.

  4. I would like someone to ask "Mr. Spam-master"….why YouTube is getting spammed into the next galaxy with "My mom is making $5400.00 a week sitting at home..blah, blah, blah"?!

    You can't even stop spam on your own Google owned site. What makes you think you have a clue what you doing with some perfectly good websites that you are destroying in the SERP's?

  5. Matt has been saying this for some time now. I think a little more transparency and direction included in warnings and denied reconsideration request responses would be beneficial for everyone.

  6. It really good action to aware webmasters about bad links and url problems. Sometime we couldn't find what errors we are doing exactly. I hope with the help of example url message webmaster will be able to fetch spamming problems

  7. I think in many cases a few examples are really enough to set you on the right track. It would be nice, if rejecting a reconsideration request, Google would tell webmasters a few more examples each time. I have had people ask me for advice after receiving a rejection, and it's a lot tougher with no new examples to give a clue what area to look in.

  8. I can't believe it?!?!?!?!? I never thought you would divulge such info at least not this early in the game. I can't wait to see the long lists of links pages, footer links, networked sites, directories, content farms and other garbage showing up in WMT. I ain't from Missouri but you're gonna have to show me the links before I believe it…

  9. Not useful. I have an important client site that I am not able to pull out of the doghouse, because Google Team will not list the offending links for me. They are not to be found in the table of incoming links that Webmaster Tools makes available, as the example offending url the Google Team sent me was not amongst the Webmaster Tools links. I have no means to identify and remove the problem links.

  10. It's a big problem not knowing which links are the offending ones because I keep getting denied reconsideration requests for certain clients, even after thoroughly documenting extensive outreach and uploading all known bad links to the disavow tool. We're all looking forward to specific URLs in Webmaster Tools from the Google Search Quality Team.

  11. Thumbs down to everyone who says: "Thanks for answering Matt Cutts, you are such a wonderful human being".
    Oy Vey!………this guy NEVER answers a question with a direct answer. It is always some roundabout non-answer that just wastes a minute or two of everyone's time.

  12. We want examples for algorithm penalty too!
    Google: "No……if everyone having a same quality, our ranking system will no longer work because we can't have multiple sites for position #1. Someone got to be on the 2nd or 3rd page of search results, and when they don't know why, they will make lesser noise than they know. ^^ "

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *